Search Constraints
Filtering by:
Keyword
Open Repositories 2015
Remove constraint Keyword: Open Repositories 2015
Subject
Hydra Project
Remove constraint Subject: Hydra Project
1 - 10 of 10
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
-
- Description:
- A presentation given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis, described thus, Fedora, Hydra, Solr, and Blacklight. Called “Ichabod,” this tool has allowed us to ingest, normalize, and enrich metadata from diverse systems of record and make it consumable by our main discovery tool, which is powered by the Ex-Libris product Primo. We developed Ichabod using the Agile methodology and involving developers from three distinct NYU Libraries groups. The software will lay the groundwork for future innovation in the areas of metadata management and discovery for repository content. The relationships we established have already made it possible for a similar collaboration arrangement on two other projects, with more to come in the future., and From DSpace to Drupal, NYU has a variety of systems to ingest and display curated digital content. To make this content discoverable centrally, we developed a tool for metadata ingest, transformation, and discovery based on a popular open-source software stack
- Keyword:
- Metadata, Workflow, Architecture, Hydra, Open Repositories 2015, Blacklight, Digital collections, Fedora, and Solr
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Pechekhonova, Ekaterina, Harper, Corey, Kassel, Carol, and Lovins, Daniel
- Contributor:
- New York University
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/09/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- Indiana University Bloomington Libraries is involved in two new projects to digitize and store content and related metadata. Each of these projects presents unique challenges. We want to use the same technology stack for both, however, so we are choosing Fedora as a storage mechanism, with Hydra-based Sufia as a repository front end. We will discuss our decision, show advantages of this Hydra/Fedora framework, and discuss advantages of moving to Fedora 4. We will also contrast this framework with the way we might have approached these projects in the past with previous versions of Fedora and before Sufia or Hydra were options. and A presentation given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus
- Keyword:
- Fedora, Digital collections, Hydra, Archives, Open Repositories 2015, Sufia, and Metadata
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Hardesty, Juliet L and Halliday, James
- Contributor:
- Indiana University
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/11/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- A presentation given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus, provide an update on progress to date, At the University of Alberta Libraries we are currently developing a Digital Asset Management System (‘Hydra North’, built on Hydra and Fedora 4) to bring all of our digital assets into one platform for discovery, access and preservation. The metadata underlying these repositories has been created according to many standards (DC, MODS, EAD, etc.) and varies in level of fullness and overall quality. We find ourselves at a ‘metadata crossroads’ as we attempt to bring this disparate metadata together. We see a solution in a move to RDF and the application of the principles of linked data. In this presentation we will discuss some of the initial questions we asked ourselves as we tried to fully grasp what the move to RDF and linked data would mean for our existing metadata, provide concrete examples of the thought processes and workflows involved in moving from existing non-RDF metadata to RDF, based on the principles of linked data, outline some of the decisions we made along the way, and why, and what the impact has been, and reflect on lessons learned and outline next steps.
- Keyword:
- Metadata, Resource Description Framework (RDF), Hydra, Open Repositories 2015, and Fedora
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Farnel, Sharon
- Contributor:
- University of Alberta
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/10/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- A proposal for a presentation given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus, One of the many successes of the Hydra community is the fundamental notion from which its name is derived—the concept of many interfaces (“heads”) over top of a single repository (the “body”). The recent release of Fedora 4, with its internal RDF-centric model, has spurred efforts for a community-wide model of collections and works, such that the heads can be sure that the body will behave as they expect it to. That model has been designed and vetted by the Hydra community, and its architecture and initial implementations will be presented in this paper. [Note, and the subject of this proposal has since become known as the 'Portland Common Data Model'.]
- Keyword:
- Community, Data model, Resource Description Framework (RDF), Hydra, Portland Common Data Model (PCDM), Open Repositories 2015, and Fedora
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Stroop, Jon, Sanderson, Rob, and Cowles, Esmé
- Contributor:
- University of California San Diego, Princeton University, and Stanford University
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/10/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Other
-
- Description:
- A panel presentation given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus and Partnerships for shared repositories offer the promise of repository services at a decreased cost due to shared infrastructure and staff. In practice, reduced costs for shared repositories often require tradeoffs in security or access for the shared system. Staff working in a shared system may be geographically distributed or may work for different institutions with different priorities and reporting lines. Effective use of shared services requires thoughtful communication and tools that help maintain consistency and prevent conflicts when multiple people work in the same system. In this panel, shared repository service managers for multisite Islandora installations and a Hydra partnership will discuss methods for distributing system access and communicating with staff who work at our parent organizations, partner institutions, and third-party vendors. Each panelist will discuss the methods used so that distributed staff can have the level of access necessary to use the repository’s unique functions, while also ensuring that widely distributed system access doesn’t result in data loss or system failures.
- Keyword:
- Fedora, Digital collections, Hydra, Vendors, Open Repositories 2015, Islandora, Documentation, Repository, and Training
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Dean, Robin, Estlund, Karen, and Herbert, John
- Contributor:
- University of Oregon Libraries, CO Alliance of Research Libraries, and LYRASIS
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/09/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- To offer an interface for the library’s digital collections and archives, Yale Library has adopted the hydra stack for what are currently 3 access interfaces, findit, an application currently supporting 9 special collections and containing approximately 700k object, the Henry Kissinger Papers which when complete will contain approximately 1.7m images, and the Yale Indian Papers Project, a small collection of approximately 2k objects . This presentation summarizes key customizations and features including ingest, contextual navigation, fulltext search, image and transcript viewing, and ongoing work with authentication and authorization. and A lightning talk given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus
- Keyword:
- Workflow, Authorization, Lightning talk, Hydra, Open Repositories 2015, and Digital collections
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- James, Eric
- Contributor:
- Yale University Library
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/09/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- At the Digital Collections and Archives (DCA) at Tufts University we have designed, built, and integrated our archival collection management system and repository’s administrative interface to facilitate ingesting archival objects into our Fedora based repository. This 24x7 session briefly explores the assumptions and functional requirements we have used to guide this development work. The DCA’s unique position as an archives that is one of the key stakeholders and users of the Tufts institutional repository has enabled us to meet this integration challenge. The session describes how the integration of our archival collection management system and our repository relies on the ability to flexibly move metadata from one system to another. and A lightning talk given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus
- Keyword:
- Case study, Digital collections, Hydra, Repository, Archives, Open Repositories 2015, Lightning talk, and Metadata
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Faulder, Erin
- Contributor:
- Tufts University
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/09/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- Open source software isn’t really free. This might seem obvious to some, but there are many members of open source communities that consume rather than contribute, Slides from a panel session given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus, and they use the software but are either unwilling or unable to engage with the community to write code, submit use cases, create documentation, or do any of the other things that make an open source project a success. Fortunately, things don't have to be this way. Over the past two years, the Fedora project has undertaken a great effort to revitalize not only the software but the community itself. By maintaining open, transparent communication, soliciting use cases, development, and testing from community members, and establishing a clear project governance structure, we have laid the groundwork for a successful community source project. At the same time, the Islandora and Hydra communities have pursued similar strategies to build and sustain their own communities and the broader Fedora community. This panel will feature a discussion on the recent successes of the Fedora community and future plans to continue raising the level of community engagement and project ownership.
- Keyword:
- Community, Collaboration, Islandora, Hydra, Open Repositories 2015, and Fedora
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Ruest, Nick, Wilcox, David, and Cramer, Tom
- Contributor:
- York University, DuraSpace, and Stanford University
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/09/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- In the past year, the major groundwork has been laid for repository systems to support ORCID identifiers. DSpace, Hydra, and EPrints all have support for storing and managing ORCIDs. However, we are still in the early stages of ORCID adoption. Only a small fraction of repository content is annotated with ORCIDs, and most end-users have not yet realized any benefit from the features based on ORCID. This panel will bring together representatives of major repository systems to relate the current status of ORCID implementations, discuss plans for future work, and identify shared goals and challenges. The panelists will discuss how ORCID support provides practical benefits both to repository staff and end-users, with a focus on features that exist now or will exist in the next year. and Slides from a panel session given at the Open Repositories conference in 2015 held in Indianapolis described thus
- Keyword:
- Metadata, DSpace, Hydra, Open Repositories 2015, and ORCID
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Luyten, Bram, Johnson, Rick, Scherle, Ryan, West, Peter, and Pottinger, Hardy
- Contributor:
- University of Notre Dame, Dryad Digital Repository, University of Missouri System, Atmire, and Digital Repository Services Ltd
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Language:
- English
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Presentation
-
- Description:
- The t-shirt design for the Open Repositories conference in Indianapolis in 2015.Open Repositories
- Keyword:
- Open Repositories 2015 and T-shirt design
- Subject:
- Hydra Project
- Creator:
- Murdock, Michael
- Contributor:
- Sabor Design Studio
- Owner:
- rob@scientist.com
- Date Modified:
- 07/24/2023
- Date Created:
- 06/2015
- Rights Statement Tesim:
- In Copyright
- License Tesim:
- Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 International
- Resource Type:
- Image