A presentation given at the Open Repositories conference in 2010. In part, the proposal reads and While repositories provide obvious benefits in hosting and managing content, it is equally clear that there is no “one size fits all” solution to the range of digital asset management needs at a typical institution, much less across institutions. A system that supports the submission, approval and dissemination of electronic theses and dissertations, for example, has demonstrably different requirements than a digitization workflow solution, an e-science data repository, or media preservation and access system. There is a clear need in the repository community to readily develop and deploy content-, domain-, and institution-specific solutions that integrate the flexibility and richness of customized applications and workflows with the underlying power of repositories for content management, access and preservation. This paper will provide an overview of Hydra’s philosophy, architecture, and components, as well as demonstrations of various Hydra installations. The paper will also provide a progress report on Hydra development to date and its overall roadmap, as well as provide observations on the successes and challenges of community-based development of shared repository solutions.
Keyword:
Community, Open Repositories 2010, Architecture, Repository, and Hydra
Subject:
Hydra Project
Creator:
Sadler, Bess, Sigmon, Tim, Mene, Willy, Green, Richard A, Staples, Thornton, McRae, Lynn, Cramer, Tom, and Awre, Christopher L
Contributor:
University of Hull, DuraSpace, University of Virginia, and Stanford University
Powerpoint presentation given at Open Repositories 2009 (OR09) in Atlanta, GA, 20 May 2009 describing the different workflow strategies being developed in the Hydra Project.
Keyword:
Case study, Workflow, and Hydra
Subject:
Hydra Project
Creator:
McRae, Lynn, Piazza, Nathan, Green, Richard A, and Open Repositories 2009
Contributor:
Fedora Commons, University of Virginia, Stanford University Libraries, Cramer, Tom, University of Hull, Sigmon, Tim, and Wayland, Ross
As part of the Mellon-funded AIMS project, the Universities of Virginia, Hull, Stanford and Yale have spent the last two years exploring the ramifications and distinct requirements of born digital archival materials in libraries. This presentation focuses on the partners’ research and prototyping of tools, infrastructure and workflows necessary to provide an end-to-end environment for born digital archival materials.
Keyword:
Grants, DLF Forum 2011, Hydra, and Archives
Subject:
Hydra Project
Creator:
Dushay, Naomi, Meloni, Julie, Cramer, Tom, Olson, Michael, and Daigle, Bradley
Contributor:
Yale University, Andrew W Mellon Foundation, University of Virginia, and Stanford University
Do you ever wonder what working groups exist in the Hydra community or what topics are being discussed or how to spark a discussion or a working group? We are proposing a framework for interest groups and working groups which has proven effective in other successful communities toward raising awareness, connecting members with common interests, spawning action oriented working groups and making time at face to face meetings in support of both "percolating" ideas and heads down work. Join us to explore how this framework can further empower our community. and A presentation at Hydra Connect #2 described thus
Keyword:
Connect #2 (Fall 2014), Governance, Interest and Working Groups, Hydra, and Community
Subject:
Hydra Project
Creator:
Ruggaber, Robin and Sanderson, Rob
Contributor:
University of Virginia and Stanford University Libraries
Horton, Glen, Richeson, Sue, Cole, Carolyn, University of Virginia, Indiana University, University of Cincinnati, Clough, Paul, Stromming, Mike, James, Eric, Northwestern University, Burke, Patrick, Data Curation Experts, and Halliday, Jim
